-->

Edited by Riza V. Tjahjadi

(..) di tengah situasi ekonomi dunia yang tidak menentu ini, sesungguhnya kita patut bersyukur, karena kondisi pangan negara kita relatif lebih baik dari banyak negara lain. Mungkin fakta ini belum banyak diketahui masyarakat. Oleh karena itu, pada kesempatan ini, saya ingin menyampaikan kepada Sidang Dewan yang terhormat, dan kepada

seluruh rakyat Indonesia, insya Allah, pada tahun ini kita

kembali mencapai swa sembada beras. Ini adalah untuk pertama kalinya sejak masa

Orde Baru, produksi beras nasional lebih tinggi daripada konsumsi beras kita.

Itulah sebabnya, juga untuk pertama kali sejak masa Orde Baru, harga beras di

dalam negeri lebih rendah daripada harga beras internasional... Pemerintah telah menetapkan bahwa stok beras nasional ditingkatkan hingga mencapai 3 juta ton, dari sebelumnya hanya

1 juta ton. Barulah setelah itu, kita berbicara tentang kemungkinan ekspor beras.

(..) in the current uncertainty of the world economic, actually we should make praise, because the country food condition relatively good compare to other countries. Maybe this fact is not much recognised by people at large. Therefore in this opportunity I want to address to honorable parliament members, and to all the people of Indonesia, Insya Allah (God will) this year we will reach again rice-self-sufficiency. This is the first time after the New Order era, national rice production higher than our rice consumption. That is why, for the first time since the New Order era, domestic rice price is lower than the international rice price... The government has set increasing target of national stockpile with around 3 million tons, which previously only 1 million tons. Afterward we deal toward our potency

for exporting rice.

(President of Republic Indonesia Dr. H. Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono addressing a draft of the State Budget, 15 August 2008)

The government seriously striving to attain food self-sufficiency since 2005. Output resulted from implementation of various programs which funded from budget allocation of sub-function of Agriculture within the state budget in the last three years, are: (i) achievement of increase of average rice production with 1.5 per annum, even though in 2007 rice production increase to 4.7% or 57.07 million tons, above projection of target amounted 55.46 million tons; (ii) achievement to increase national production of maize with average 5.4 percent per annum (p.50)

Data above is higher than projection made as planned by the ministry of agriculture for 2005-2009 which set target rice production increase from 55.03 million tons in 2005 to 57.71 million tons in 2009 with average 1.21% per annum.

It worthy to note, the average of farm size only 0.09 hectare, and around 53% of household farming managed less than 0.5 hectare. Small scale farmer with less than 0.5 hectare has had increased, from 10.8 million households in1993 to 13.7 million households in 2003 (or 2.6 % per annum).

Census on Agriculture 2003 also revealed from total 24,868,675 households farming both in rural and urban areas there were 13,770,100 households who grows rice alone. Meanwhile the biggest number was farmers who cultivated rice in combination palawija (rice/ palawija) 18,258,858 households. Farmers cultivated Palawija alone, and horticulture, and small holding plantation was 10,858,258, and 8,457,228, and 6,943,183 households. Meanwhile farmers were cultivating forest trees totally 3,427,491 households (Tjahjadi, 3 Nov. 2005). Additionally, Ministry of Agriculture show (2005) from total 25.58 million household farming there were 18.12 households (70.84%) grow rice in 2003.

Table 1. Indicators

Land managed/controlled by household and use the land, excluded Aceh or Nangroe Aceh Darussalam, NAD; it was arm conflict area (Agri Census 2003: p.19-21; 31-33)
Location	Land for Agriculture 2003 (hectare)
	Sawah (wet rice field)			Non-sawah		Total
Urban	605,447.62			731,011.91		1,336,459.73
Rural	4,417,211.30			11,623,803.97		16,041,015.27
Total	5,022,659.12			12,354,615.88		17,377,475.00
Average (m2)	Sawah			Non-sawah		Total
Urban	1,624.32			1,961.18		3,585.50
Rural	2,089.38			5,498.16		7,587.54.
Total	2,019.67			4,968.02		6,987.70
Harvested Area (2006-2008)		11.786.430 (2006)		12.147.637 (2007)		12.385.242 (2008)
Production (2006-2008)		54.454.937		57.157.435		59.877.219
Labour absorption (2009)		44.2 million
Education attainment (2003)		35% not finish primary school, 46% primary school, 13% middle high school
Rice variety, mostly planted			IR64		Released mid 1980s
Hybrid rice variety, mostly reported 2007-2008			Bernas Super		Imported seeds from China
Hybrid rice variety, cultivation system			IPM, SRI, Legowo		Organic fertilizers used
Hybrid rice variety, market availability			na		Boss of Bernas Super eagerly to stockpile 1-2 tons milled hybrid rice valued at Rp2-4 trillions, but he doesn’t want called as hoader
Source: Tjahjadi (3 Nov. 2005), proceeding from Census on Agriculture 2003, and BPS 2008, Sinar Harapan daily news paper 7 April 2008, a draft of State Budget 2009.

High yield seed varieties have contribute significantly to national rice production. In the last three years seeds subsidy tends increase within the state budget. Impact of seeds subsidy has shown in national rice production during 2007 totally amounted 57.07 million tons of unmilled rice, that was 2.59 million tons or 4.76% higher compare to 2006. If it converted, from umilled rice to milled rice around will around 63.2%, then, it was equivalent with 1.64 million tons milled rice. In sum, around 82% of totally target additional 2 million tons for national rice production for 2007 has been achieved. That was the highest achievement of rice production in the last 15 years (Apriantono, 21 Jan 2008: Raker dng DPR RI).

According Minister of Agriculture Anton Apriantono, from total seeds subsidy has been planted to 1.4 million hectares rice fields with average increase in productivity between 0.25 to 1 ton per hectares. That was contribution of the quality of high yielding varieties; but detail information on contribution from both inbred rice seeds and hubrid rice seed not available. Thus, seeds subsidy was estimated to reach 0.88 million tons unmilled rice or equivalent 553 thousand tons milled rice or 33% of total additional national production for 2007. Moreover, with additional productivity, if price of unmilled rice was Rp 2,500 per kg, therefore income of rice farmers increase, with rage, between Rp 625,000 and Rp2,500,000 per hectare (Apriantono, 21 Jan 2008: Raker dng DPR RI or Public hearing with MP; Note: 1US$-Rp9,200).

Until third week December 2007, according Apriantono, realisation of seeds subsidy distribution averagely reached 75%, included inbred rice 71%, hybrid rice 75%, hybrid maize 87%, composite-type maize 78%, and soybean seeds 63%.

Table 2 Development of Subsidy, 2005 – 2008 (trilion Rupiah)
Description	2005		2006		2007		2008
	Realisasi	% to PDB	Realisasi	% to PDB	Realisasi	% to PDB	Realisasi Est	% to PDB
I. Subsidi Energi 1. Subsidi Fuel (BBM) 2. Subsidi Electicyti	104.4 95.6 8.9	3.8 3.4 0.3	94.6 64.2 30.4	2.8 1.9 0.9	116.9 83.8 33.1	3.0 2.1 0.8	268.7 180.3 88.4	5.7 3.9 1.9
II. Subsidi Non-Energi 1. Subsidi Food 2. Subsidi Fertuliser 3. Subsidi Seeds 4. PSO, Public Service Obligation 5. Kredit Program 6. Subsidi Cooking oil 7. Subsidi Soybean 7. Subsidi Taxes 8. Subsidi Others	16.3 6.4 2.5 0.1 0.9 0.1 - - 6.2 -	0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - 0.2 -	12.8 5.3 3.2 0.1 1.8 0.3 - - 1,9 0.3	0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 - - 0.1 0.0	33.3 6.6 6.3 0.5 1.0 0.3 0.0 - 17.1 1.5	0.8 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.4 0.0	59.1 12.0 15.2 1.0 1.7 3.2 0.5 0.5 25.0 -	1.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 -
Total	120.8	4.3	107.4	3.2	150.2	3.8	327.8	7.0

Macro target pursued by the government in 2009, includes (1) PDB of agriculture grow with around 4.6%, (2) labour absoption target to 44.2 million people or expected increase 0.8 million people, (3) malnutrition incident decrease with around 1.0%, (4) Term of trade of rice farmers expected between 115 and 120, and (5) trade balance sheet of agriculture will surplus around US $ 16.22 billion. In production side, for 2009 target covers (1) rice production reach between 63 and 64 million tons unmilled rice or increase 5.0% compare to 2008, (2) corn production reach 18 million tons or increase 10.0% compare to 2008, (3) soybean production 1,2 million tons or increase 30.0% compare to 2008, (4) canesugar production 3.3 million tons or increase 20.0% compare to 2008, also (5) meat cow production 411,000 tons or increase 10.0% compare to 2008. (Apriantono, 21 Jan 2008: Raker dng DPR RI or a public hearing with Commission IV on Agriculture and Fisheries of Parliament)

State seed subsidy

Until early 2005 seed subsidy indirectly allocated to farmers, as Riza V. Tjahjadi (14 Jan. 2005) revealed: the government has subsidized for seeds to producers amounted Rp 100 billion per annum. With this kind of subsidy farmers have right to buy seed with around Rp 500 cheaper than real price, as claimed by chair of the national seed board (also: Kompas, 20 July 2004; 1 US$ = Rp 9,020-Rp 9,128).

For illustration, the State Budget-Additional (APBN-Tambahan 2004) dated 18 October 2004 subsidy of rice seeds amounted 16,200 tons with value Rp 73,024,477,200.00 allocated to Perum Sang Hyang Seri (SHS), a state-own company. Meanwhile total seeds subsidy within APBN-Tambahan 2004 to PT SHS amounted Rp 99.890.760.000,00 included soybean 1.000 tons valued Rp 6,943,099,800.00, and corn 1.000 tons valued Rp19,923,183,000.00. This was shown in audit report carried out by Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, BPK, or the Supreme Audit Agency examined implementation of public service obligation (PSO) to PT SHS as buffer stock of national seeds (BPK dated 7 July 2006)

On the other hand, Bambang Sayaka et all (2006) revealed application of certified seeds of rice, corn, and soybean was very low. In the last ten years (1996-2005), the average of certified seed only around 22.02% of total planted areas in Indonesia, although there were two provinces which reached above the general pictures; certified rice seeds in East Jawa reached 38% and in the last two years in South Sulawesi certified rice seeds reached 30% respectively.

Subsidised seeds, especially rice seeds as results of analysis on seed system of food commodity and main estate crops by Bambang Sayaka et all (2006) which produced by PT SHS and PT Pertani was not bring much benefit to farmers since the prices relatively the same with non0subsidy rice seeds. Moreover, hybrid rice seeds were not much available in the market since several characteristics of this seeds were not taken for granted by farmers. Such characteristics included susceptible to pests and diseases, highvariability of yields among region and seasons whilst potential yield was only 5.0% above inbred rice seeds. Besides price of hybrid rice seeds relatively expensive, around Rp 30,000 per kg (compare to Rp 6,000 kg for inbred variety).

Table 3. Bantuan Langsung Benih Unggul (Direct Subsidy to High Yield Seed Varieties) on State Budget 2008; Tons

No	Province	Indicative Target		Plan for Realisation Plan		Plan for Realisation
		Hybrid rice		Hybrid rice		Non Hybrid rice
		Areal	Volume	SHS	PT Pertani	SHS	PT Pertani
1	NAD	2,000	30,00	30.00	-	200.00	225.00
2	N. Sumatera	900	13.50	13.50	-	500.00	625.00
3	W. Sumatera	-	-	-	-	-	550.00
4	Riau	400	6.00	-	6.00	-	87.50
5	Jambi	500	7.50	7.50	-	90.00	100.00
6	S. Sumatera	2,000	30.00	30.00	-	100.00	650.00
7	Bengkulu	1,000	15.00	-	15.00	50.00	62.50
8	Lampung	11,800	172.50	100.00	72.50	275.00	375.00
9	Kepri	-	-	-	-	-	-
	Sumatera	18,300	274.50	181.00	93.50	1,215.00	2,675.00
10	D.K.I. Jakarta	-	-	-	-	-	-
11	W. Jawa	7,100	106,50	106.50	-	1,500.00	1,625.00
12	C. Jawa	8,000	120.00	120.00	-	1,000.00	1,375.00
13	D.I. Yogyakarta	1,000	15.00	15.00	-	-	141.25
14	E. Jawa	40,033	600.50	297.50	303.00	650.00	1.300.00
15	Banten	500	7.50	7.50	-	147.00	540.00
	Jawa (not Java)	56,633	849.50	546.50	303.00	3,297.50	4,981.25
16	Bali	2,000	30.00	-	30.00	-	125.00
17	NTB	2,400	36.00	-	36.00	-	312.00
18	NTT	2,500	37.50	-	37.00	-	87.00
	Bali & Nusra	6,900	103.50	-	103.50	-	525.00
19	W. Kalimantan	2,700	40.50	40.50	-	275.00	100.00
20	C. Kalimantan	-	-	-	-	125.00	-
21	E. Kalimantan	1,100	16.50	16.50	-	62.50	100.00
22	S. Kalimantan	1,200	18.00	18.00	-	300.00	200.00
	Kalimantan	5,000	75.00	75.00	-	762.50	400.00
23	N. Sulawesi	3,500	52.50	52.50	-	100.00	90.00
24	C. Sulawesi	2,500	37.50	37.50	-	-	275.00
25	S. Sulawesi	15,000	225.00	225.00	-	725.00	900.00
26	SE Sulawesi	-	-	-	-	-	100.00
27	Gorontalo	2,500	37.50	37.60	-	100.00	-
28	W. Sulawesi	3,000	45.00	45.00	-	100.00	-
	Sulawesi	26,500	397.50	397.50	-	1,025.00	1.365.00
29	Maluku	-	-	-	-	-	18.75
30	Maluku Utara	-	-	-	-	-	18.75
31	Papua	-	-	-	-	-	12.50
32	Papua Barat	-	-	-	-	-	3.75
	Maluku & Papua	-	-	-	-	-	53.75
	J a w a (not Java)	56.633	849.50	548.50	303.00	3,297.50	4,981.50
	Outer Jawa	56.700	850.50	653.50	197.00	3,002.50	5,018.75
	Indonesia	113.333	1,700.00	1,200.00	500.00	6,300.00	10,000.00

Note: Seeds needed of hybrid rice 15 kg/ hectare, and 26 kg/ hectare for non-hybrid seed rice.

Source: Excerpt from DG on Food Crops of Ministry of Agriculture; dated: 4/21/2008; the rest two column on right (above) for a comparison; soybean and corn are excluded.

The state of Indonesia, in the last three years, has subsidising to hybrid rice seed companies – both seed producers and seed importer/ distributors. On the other hand seeds companies have been promoting two selling prices: a lower price to the state and a higher price – with average nine to ten times higher compare to selling prices of inbred rice seed varieties – to farmers.

Within the state budget, the state has been subsidising the seed companies with around one-tenth of total non-hybrid (or inbred) rice seeds; 1,700 tons compare to 16,300 tons, with totally 18,000 tons which distributed with no charge to rice farmers spread out the country.

Using linear analogy to the 2008’ state budget allocation for hybrid rice seeds with no trademark mentioned; it’s just hybrid rice seeds, meanwhile there are 31 hybrid rice seeds varieties released by the minister of agriculture between 2000 and 2007. It seem SHS or Perum Sang Hyang Seri, a state-own company have enjoyed the biggest income, also the largest coverage within 18 provinces, meaning SHS which developing two hybrid rice seeds – SL8 and SL 11 varieties - in cooperation with SL AgriTech of the Philippines has got much support by the state (the government and parliament). One thousand two hundred tons compare to five hundred tons subsidy allocated to PT Pertani. As a state-own company, too, PT Pertani is one of two

distribution agencies, not a seeds producer. This also mean, hybrid rice seed companies seem tightly competed as to get state subsidy, they are, as to mention few of total nine companies according the Indonesian Seed Association (Asbenindo, 2007), PT Sumber Alam Sutra, SAS of Group Artagraha, PT Bayer Indonesia, PT Dupont Indonesia, PT. Karya Niaga Beras Mandiri, all with only 7 provinces (Tjahjadi, 2008).

In fact, until 18 June 2008 realisation or implementation of BLBU only reach less than 20% of total value of BLBU, consisted of non-hybrid rice seeds only amounted 4.270 tons compare to total amount of subsidy allocation16.300 tons, hybrid rice seeds 181 tons compare to 1.700 tons, plus soybean seeds 3.322 tons compare to 4,436 tons, and hybrid corn seeds768 tons compare to 3,650 tons. Total amount disbursement was Rp 66 billions meanwhile total subsidy in the state budget for 2008 are Rp 389.64 billion.

According minister of agriculture Anton Apriantono in a public hearing with Commission IV of the parliament (18June 2008) disbursement of BLBU just began for second planting season (planting season within dry season) meanwhile the rest of BLBU will disbursed, at least November this year. Last year, 2007, implementation of BLBU reached 97% of total hybrid rice seeds allocation and 99% for non-hybrid rice seeds. During 2007 disbursement of hybrid rice seeds amounted 1,023 tons compare to total allocation 1,050 tons and non-hybrid rice seeds 5,961 tons compare to 6,000 tons, meanwhile disbursement for corn and soybean reached around 100%.

BLBU, however, is a part of overall seeds subsidy in the state budget. Total seeds subsidy for corn, rice and soybean amounted Rp 689.70 billion, consisted of Rp 110.01 billion as seeds subsidy, national stock seeds Rp 190.04 billion and BLBU Rp 389.64 billion (Antara, 18 June 2008; 1US$ = Rp 9,150 at money changer).

According a decree of minister of finance 30 October 2007 subsidy for seeds of corn both composite and hybrid type seeds, rice seeds and soybean seeds are benih sebar or extension seeds and/or benih pokok or stock seeds.

Table 4. Price subsidy to seeds of paddy, soybean, hybrid corn and composite corn

Subsidy	Paddy (Rp/ kg)	Soybean (Rp/ kg)	Hybrid corn (Rp/ kg)	Composite corn (Rp/ kg)
Harga Pokok Produksi Or HPP (basic production costs)	5,060	7,990	29,200	7, 900
Harga Penyerahan or HP(delivery costs)	4,390	6,650	24,200	6,710
Subsidy	670 (7 Cent US$)	1,340 (14 Cent US$)	5,000 (55 Cent US$)	1,190 (13 Cent US$)
Profit Margin	250	360	1,450	395

Note: Currency rate 1US$ = Rp 9,080 by 1 November 2007 at money changer

Source: Proceed from a decree of minister of finance: Peraturan Menteri Keuangan No. 130/PMK.02/2007 dated 30 Oct.2007

In third quarter of 2008 the hybrid rice promoters may be grinning or a little smile since their competitors – with inbred rice seeds varieties - face serious situations. All newly inbred rice with yield almost equal with hybrid rice, totally three varieties, have been recognised as illegal since without certification been promoting to farmers with mass scale target. As to remember, two of three rice seed varieties are MSP and Super Toy HL2 promotes by two political camps: Megawati Soekarno Putri, and SBY, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono – both campaigning higher yield as much as claimed by hybrid rice promoters – all claim yields are above 12-14 tons dry grains per hectare. The rest of three inbred varieties, namely Padi Saputra with 9.76 tons dry grains per hectare is promoted by an agriculturist.

All three inbreed varieties, of course, are not included in the subsidised seed price. However, in some rice field areas, for example in East Jawa (not Java) farmers prefer MSP rice varieties than hybrid rice… but:, in general saying, competitors are lessen, in the eyes hybrid rice promoters, except competition among themselves, although most of them, in the last three years, have been enjoying “promotion” through “subsidy price rice seed scheme” within the state budget since 2006 till now. It worthy to note, hidden but strong in the competition among hybrid rice promoters are imported seeds from China and India – the so-called introduction – versus domestic seed breeding varieties.

Several agricultural officers from provincial administrations backed by farmers’ groups clearly stated to reject imported hybrid rice seeds except domestic-produced hybrid rice seeds. On the other hand one of new players in hybrid rice seeds marketing from China embracing army, at least, commander in chief army, included two regional military commanders as partner in field cultivation.

However, technically there are two important advantages gained by hybrid rice promoters the subsidised price of hybrid rice seeds. First, they are the real subsidised entity by the state within the State Budget. They are also the real free-rider in seed sales promotion and technological assessment of hybrid rice with sustainable-sound agriculture such as IPM (integrated pest management) or NPM, nitrogen management, or integrated crop farming or so through the so-called farmer’s field school.

Farmers’ Field School for hybrid rice

There are 31 varieties of hybrid rice released by the minister of agriculture between 2001 and 2007. Parent lines or restorer of those hybrid rice came from Balai Benih Padi or BB Padi= 2, China = 13, Philippines = 2, IRRI = 6, India = 3, and Japan = 5. Maturity days of these hybrid rice varieties range between 85-104 days, and 83-107 days, with parent from Japan for upland irrigated rice field, to 121 days with parent from China (for lowland irrigated rice field). Owner of hybrid rice varieties are the government and private companies. Balai Benih Padi or BB Padi in Sukamandi in West Jawa owned four hybrid rice varieties and the rest 29 varieties owned by private companies; 10 private companies of which one of them cooperate with a state-own company.

Budget allocation to ministry of agriculture, especially program to increase food security, as proposed in the draft of state budget for 2009, will be used to shoulder priority activities, includes (...)(vi) research and dissemination agriculture innovation (Primatani and Sekolah Lapang Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu/PTT) or farmers’ field school on integrated crop management amounted Rp 355.0 billion (...) Expected Output will include (...)(iv) rice seeds subsidy 25,000 tons of non-hybrid rice, 750 tons hybrid rice seeds, 1,125 tons hybrid corn seeds, 4,000 tons soybean seeds, horticultura seeds in 32 regions, coffee bean seeds 2,025 hectares, pepper seeds 710 hectares, tea seedlings 1.956 hectares and sugarcane nursery 1,130 hectares (p.88)

On program to increase welfare of the farmers, budget allocation will be directed to shoulders priority activities, include (...)(v) handling fire to lands estate plantation, other disturbing farm activities, with amount Rp13.9 billion. Expected: (…)(iii) 100,000 unit SL-PTT (Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Tanaman dan Sumberdaya Terpadu or farmers’ field school on integrated crop management) organised for food crops with target 2 million hectares of non-hybrid rice, 50,000 hectares hybrid rice, 75,000 hectares of hybrid corn, and 100,000 hectares soybean, also 500 groups of SLPHT (Sekolah Lapangan Pengendalian Hama Terpadu or integrated pest management field school) for food crops (p. 89)

Table 5. List of Varriety of Hybrid Rice Released in Indonesia

No	Variety	Institution of Owner	Released Year
1.	Intan1	PT BISI	2001
2.	Intan2	PT BISI	2001
3.	Miki1	PT KONDO	2001
4.	Miki2	PT KONDO	2001
5.	Miki3	PT KONDO	2001
6.	Maro	BB PADI	2002
7.	Rokan	BB PADI	2002
8.	Laongping Pusaka1	PT Bangun Pusaka	2002
9.	Laongping Pusaka2	PT Bangun Pusaka	2002
10.	HibrindoR1	PT Bayer Crop Science	2003
11.	HibrindoR2	PT Bayer Crop Science	2003
12.	Batang Kampar	PT Karya Niaga Beras Mandiri	2003
13.	Batang Samo	PT Karya Niaga Beras Mandiri	2003
14.	Hipa3	BB PADI	2004
15.	Hipa4	BB PADI	2004
16.	Manis4	PT KONDO	2004
17.	Manis5	PT KONDO	2004
18.	Segara Aanak	PT Makmur Sejahtera Nusa Tenggara	2005
19.	Brang Biji	PT Makmur Sejahtera Nusa Te nggara	2006
	Adirasa1	PT Triusaha Saritani	2005
20.	Adirasa64	PT Triusaha Saritani	2005
21.	PP1	PT Dupont	2005
22.	PP2	PT Dupont	2006
23.	Mapan-P.02	PT Primasid Andalan Utama	2006
24.	Mapan-P.05	PT Primasid Andalan Utama	2006
25.	Bernas Super	PT Sumber Alam Sutera	2006
26.	Bernas Prima	PT Sumber Alam Sutera	2006
27.	SL-8-SHS	SL Agritech	2006
28.	SL-11-SHS	SL Agritech	2006
29.	Hipa 5 Ceva	BB PADI	2007
30.	Hipa 6 Jete	BB PADI	2007

Source: Daerah Pengembangan Dan Anjuran Budidaya Padi Hibrida, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian, 2007

It worthy to note, hybrid rice seeds imported by PT Sumber Alam Sutera amounted 5.000 tons as said by Mufid Busairi, MP of Commission IV on Agriculture and Fisheries, from faction PKB said (Hotel Aryaduta 07 November 2007)

1. Commission IV on Agriculture and Fisheries of Parliament as well as MoA prefered domestic-based hybrid rice; no change for hybrid rice in general

2. Imported hybrid rice seed beyond authority of MoA, because this high profile trade politic between JK and TW. That’s why it seem the seed companies in the countries reluctant to file complaint to Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha, KPPU, or Commission for the Supervision of Business.

Observation & news clippings

One of example, one of relatively old released a hybrid rice seed varieties amounted 70 kgs been tested by the government within the implementation scheme of the subsidised price seed scheme of the 2008 State Budget, trough a farmer rice group (35 farmers as members) with SL or Sekolah Lapang (field school, popularly for IPM) in 5.0 hectares rice field in a west part of Yogyakarta, namely Samben in Argomulyo Village in Bantul Regency. Although by design this hybrid rice seed packaged with chemical inputs, when monitored by BioTani Indonesia and GRAIN on the first week of July 2008, seem work well – at least, no major pest destroying rice growing. Two pests, namely Green Planthooper and Green Loopers identified farmers’ group involved in the program as potential major pest that should seriously be considered.

However, farmers whenever they grow hybrid rice he/she should buy-and-buy seeds every time he plan to plan rice, meanwhile price are expensive, average 10 times higher compare to price of inbred rice varieties.

So, what are possibilities of the way out for farmers to gain better position?

It is a priority task by pro-farmers and pro-poor proponents.

03-August-2008 15:08

Sukoharjo farmers not interested to grow hybrid rice

(Petani Sukoharjo tak tertarik tanam padi hibrida)

Sukoharjo (Espos)—Farmers in Kabupaten (regent) Sukoharjo in Central Jawa say not interested to grow hybrid rice. They prefer to grow IR 64.

Head of Kebun Benih Padi Lawu I (Rice Seeds Nursery station Padi lawu I), Suwarto ST said to journalists in a village, namely di Desa Lawu Kecamatan Nguter Kabupaten Sukoharjo, Saturday (2/8), although Agriculture Agency at provincial administration has launched a hybrid rice, namely F1 HIPA6JT, which a specific-type of hybrid rice suitable for Central Jawa, in fact farmers not even to steal a look at it.

“Actually growing hybrid rice relativlely saying more profitable. In fact, not much farmers like it. Farmers prefer IR84 or Ciherang variety,” Suwarto said.

He said, hybrid rice variety has some advantages compare to inbred rice, that are more seedling and grains in panicle. Moreover, potential yield more promsing than inbred rice variety.

By: Mastris Radyamas- Solopos Online

---

Farmers experience, not clear how many planting season carried out.
”We applied organic fertilisers to hybrid rice. Harvested yield we get between 11 and 15 tons unhusk rice per hectare. Compare to chemical fertlisers, the result is one comparable to three,” said Sumarno, a farmer in Nguter Sukoharjo in Central Jawa, practicing an integrated farming (rice with cattle).

Earlier he explained for a hectare rice field needs 200 kilogram POPs, 60 liters PPC, and 6 liters liquid pesticide, with totally cost Rp 530.000

Unfortunately, although integrated farming (rice with cattle) has promising much profit, in fact, it also need relatively big working capital. Face the expensive prices to buy cattle constraining farmers to shift to such farming system.

Joko Warsito, a chair of a group of farmer, namely Gabungan Kelompok Tani Tani Jaya, in a village namely Desa Nguter, said to buy a cattle someone should pay around Rp 7 to Rp 8 million per head. Beside price of cattle feeding, esp. Soybean meal, also reletively expensive. (SON)
Note: POP = pupuk organik padat or solid or compact organic fertiliser, PPC = pupuk pelengkap cair or liquid supplement fertiliser.

Source : Kompas.com, Kamis, 26 Juni 2008

(see also: Asosiasi Pemerintah Kabupaten Seluruh Indonesia (APKASI)
Wisma Alia Lt. 4 Jl. MI Ridwan Rais 10-18 Jakarta Pusat 10110
Ph. (+62) 21 3867670, Fax (+62) 21 3867671 email: info@bkksi.or.id

--

Ngawi Farmers, East Jawa complaining hybrid rice seeds
Hundred farmers in Desa/Kecamatan Geneng, Kabupaten Ngawi, East Jawa, who aremembers of 10 farmer groups have complaint hybrid rice seeds of subsidised price seed scheme has in damaged condition caused by totor or cabuk (a kind of disease). In turn, dozen tons of hybrid rice seeds cannot be planted.

In a hamlet, Dusun Pilang Puyung 2, Desa Geneng, at leat, around 30 farmers returning hybrid rice they’d received to chair of Kelompok Tani Margo Tani.

"The seeds are in damaged condition containing totor. Farmers prefer to choose an inbred rice variety, namely Ciherang rather than hybrid rice, although hybrid rice which been distributed are high yield variety," said chair of Kelompok Tani Margo Tani Kaseri, yesterday.

Source: Media Indonesia Online, Selasa, 19 Agustus 2008 00:01 WIB

It should be noted, the word high yielded rice variety, now, shifted into hybrid rice variety. High yield variety of inbred rice varieties been eliminated.

Interesting phenomena the government through the state budget for 2008 began re-introduce organic fertilizer to farmers at large. Let’s see the years coming.

Table 6. Development Subsidy for fertilisers 2005 -2008
Description	2005	2006	2007	2008
Subsidy Fertilisers (trillion Rupiah)	2,527.3	3,165.7	6,260.5	15,184.0
% to PDB	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.3
Components:
a. Volume (ton)	5,695,819	5,674,427	6,269,455		7,045,000
-Urea	3,992,689	3,962,404	4,069,455		4,300,000
-SP-36	797,506	711,081	800,000		800,000
-ZA	643,458	600,972	700,000		700,000
-NPK	262,166	399,970	700,000		900,000
> Ponska	262,166	399,970	700,000		800,000
> Pelangi	-	-	-		50,000
> Kujang	-	-	-		50,000
-Organik	-	-	-		345,000

Source: Excerpt from RAPBN 2009, a draft of State Budget 2009

Note: 1) Total subsidy increase sharply, from 2005 to 2008, due to input prices for chemical fertilisers influenced by oil price situations in the international market.

2) A decade ago, 1 December 1998, subsidy for chemical fertilisers abolished as dictated by IMF, the International Monetary Fund, but in 2003 the government began allocated subsidy in the state budget (Tjahjadi, 2005: Agriculture Liberalisation and Bioprivateering, Input for Seacon).

«»«»«»«»«»

08Dec2008

- 000 -

Petani Apel Malang Terdepak Dua Kali; Apple growers of Malang in East Jawa was double squezes

Riza V. Tjahjadi Apple growers of Malang in East Jawa was double squezes since their farmland, included other horticulture crops have damaged by the erupsion of Mount Kelud on 13 February, meanwhile in the recent months imported apple has flooding local markets..!
 

So, the so-called the Bali Package of WTO which was proudly claimed by President SBY as the successful instrument for regenerating negotiation within the WTO, in fact, cannot help to situations face by the apple growers... Apple gwoers became losser in their own market... It can be said the goverment has not able to retain their regulation which banned importing fruits and horticulture products; only temporary banned since protested by U.S.
 



Petani Apel Malang Terdepak Dua Kali... 
Letusan Gunung Kelud merusak tanaman apel dan hortikultura, dan terdesak pasarnya oleh buah apel impor





Jumat hari buah lokal

Ayo... tetap konsumsi buah lokal bagi kesehatan konsumen, bagi keberlangsungan penanam buah lokal, dan demi kedaulatan buah..!






 oleh Riza V. Tjahjadi




Salah satu infonya

 

Petani Apel Malang, Geruduk Kemendag dan Kemenkoperek

24 Februari 2014

Jakarta | kabar3

SEKITAR seratus orang yang mengatasnamakan petani apel asal Malang dan Pasuruan, Jawa Timur menggelar aksi unjukrasa memprotes kebijakan pemerintah yang membuka keran impor buah.

Mereka menggelar aksi di Kementerian Perdagangan dan Kementerian Koordinator Perekonomian. "Harga apel Malang sekarang cuman Rp2.500. Padahal biaya produksinya mencapai Rp7.000," kata Sekretaris Jenderal Asosiasi Hortikultura Nasional (ASN), Ramdansyah, saat berorasi di depan Kantor Kemendag, Jakarta Pusat, Senin (23/2).

Dalam orasinya, mereka menuntut pemerintah, dalam hal ini Kemendag, mengurangi volume impor hortikultura yang mencapai 600-700 ribu ton. Padahal, tahun lalu pemerintah hanya mengimpor sekitar 230 ribu ton. "Harusnya pemerintah mengurangi volume impor 37 produk holtikultura yang tidak dikenai preferensi harga terutama apel," ujar Ramdansyah menambahkan. Menurut dia, impor merupakan solusi sementara jika kebutuhan nasional tak tercukupi. Selain itu, mengimpor juga harus memperhatikan musim panen raya sehingga tidak membuat harga turun.

Selain berorasi, mereka juga melempar apel Malang ke arah Kantor Kemendag. Ratusan apel Malang tampak berserakan di depan kantor Muhammad Lutfi. Puas berorasi dan melempari kantor Kemendag dengan apel, peserta unjukrasa kemudian bergeser ke kantor Kemenkoperek. Mereka kembali berorasi, menuntut Menko Perekonomian, Hatta Rajasa untuk memperhatikan nasib para petani apel yang merugi akibat kebijakan impor buah. Tak mendapat tanggapan, mereka kemudian membubarkan diri sekira pukul 13.20 WIB. Namun, para petani ini mengancam akan kembali datang untuk memperjuangkan tuntutan mereka.

Suasana aksi unjukrasa di depan Kantor Kemendag, Jakarta Pusat, Senin (23/2). | Foto oleh : Muhammad Ahfadh Fazlurrohman

http://www.kabar3.com/news/2014/02/petani-apel-malang-geruduk-kemendag-dan-kemenkoperek



Data terakhir dari penelitian Universitas Brawijaya, jumlah pohon apel Malang terus menurun. Pada 2005 silam jumlah pohon apel ada sekitar 4 juta pohon. Kemudian pada 2010 turun menjadi 2 juta pohon. Pada 2013 lalu hanya ada sekitar 1,2 juta pohon yang tersisa. Bila terus seperti ini, apel malang terancam punah.
___


http://m.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/ritel/14/02/24/n1hvbl-petani-apel-demo-kemendag-protes-maraknya-buah-impor

Repro: Republika online

Kilas balik

Riza V. Tjahjadi

February 24 · Edited

S U K S E S
Semoga
S U K S E S

Ref/ ingat status saya Kamis [20/02/14] silam:

Riza V. Tjahjadi
PAKET BALI WTO kapan diterjemahkan kongkrit bagi perlindungan petani buah..?

Jangan cuma mampu meraih asa tapi cuma angin baik..? Apa yang sudah digolkan WTO saja tidak mampu cepat dilanjutkan dengan aksi perlindungan atawa apresiasi bagi petani, masih NOL Besar..!

Ingin suara tolakan NO TO WTO; Our SOVEREIGNTY NOT for SALE inginkah bergema kembali?

Apel Malang yang akan dibuang petani buah adalah contoh pertama kegagalan uraikan Paket Bali WTO bagi petani Indonesia..!

[Ooooooooo... Teringat daku akan poster: Rezim Gede Bacot..]

Kamis, 20 Februari 2014 07:15:07 WIB

Tiga Ton Apel Malang Akan Dibuang Petani

JAKARTA (Pos Kota) – Kecewa impor hortikultura diumbar, petani apel Malang, Jawa Timur berencana menggelar demo di Jakarta. Mereka berangkat ke Ibukota dengan membawa 3 ton apel Malang untuk dibuang di depan kantor Kementerian Perdagangan.

Dst
¤¤
¤

—

 https://www.facebook.com/riza.v.tjahjadi



---o0o---





 

Standards on Sustainable Agriculture, biotani participate in a public consultation to second draft of SAN, Jakarta 27 Feb 2014

Standards on Sustainable Agriculture 

Biotani participate in a public consultation to second draft of SAN, Jakarta 27 Feb 2014

 


by Riza V. Tjahjadi
biotani@gmail.com



Second round of Public Consultation Workshop of the Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN) on Sustainable Agriculture Standards revision for agriculture and cattle producer groups and farms held in Jakarta 27 February 2014. I was one of participants.

The Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN) is a coalition of independent non-profit conservation organizations that promote the social and environmental sustainability of agricultural activities by developing standards. The Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN) promotes efficient agriculture, biodiversity conservation and sustainable community development by creating social and environmental standards. SAN fosters best management practices across agricultural value chains by encouraging farmers to comply with SAN standards and by motivating traders and consumers to support sustainability.

 

The new standard scheduled be published in July 2014 after approval from SAN’s International Standards Committee and General Assembly and will be binding for audits one year later. SAN wants to make its Sustainable Agriculture Standards more adaptable to smallholder scenarios – which comprise 90% of the farms in our system – rollout additional modules in the standard, add innovative elements and improve the interpretation and scoring of the standard’s criteria during certification audits.

During our first consultation round in 2013, more than 1,000 stakeholders like farm representatives, trainers, auditors, certifiers and representatives from Africa, Asia and Latin America and consuming markets of North America, Oceania and Europe participated contributing more than 10,000 comments with recommendations reflected in the public consultation report available at the following webpage: http://publicconsultation.sanstandards.org/


The standards contain new and innovative elements in areas such as:
~ Productivity and product quality
~ SAN living wage and living income
~ Gender equity
~ Adaptation to climate change
~ Elimination of invasive species
~ New lists of prohibited and to be phased-out pesticides based on technical parameters
~ An adjusted scoring system with new elements for continuous improvement.

The new standards cover more than 70 certifiable crops, such as coffee, cocoa, tea, banana, sugarcane, oil palm and pineapple, as well as cattle and rice production systems of Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania.

Work plan

Public Consultation SECOND ROUND –
second SAN Standards Draft   
January 10 – March 11, 2014
~ Online consultation
~ Public consultation workshops, meetings and trial audits


Analysis of comments & Preparation of
Final Draft
April-May 2014
~ Analysis of second round results
~ ISC meeting in April


Approval & Publishing of standards and related policies   
July 1, 2014
~ SAN General Assembly approval
~ Publication on SAN website


Standards binding for audits   
Jan 1, 2016 onwards
~ Certification audits for all operations based on new standards





First Round Results
±1,000 participants from 50 countries

Most commented principles
Labor (living wage)
Productivity and Integrated Crop Management (ICM)
Ecosystem conservation

Comments on structure
Too high number of criteria
Too high proportion of critical crite

Trial Audits:
Brazil: Coffee plantation
Colombia: Coffee producer group
Costa Rica: Banana plantation
Cattle ranch (beef production)
Ghana: Cocoa producer group
Kenya: Tea producer group

 

Objectives:
~ Define minimum percentage for new proposed scoring system
~ Are the proposed applicability requirements realistic for smallholdings & group administrators?
~ Understand cost implications for new requirements
~ Are all criteria auditable?
~ Propose means of verification for criteria
~ Suggest wording improvements

Material on second draft
Only 4 new critical criteria

Data recording for measuring of impacts
~ No mixture of certified products with non-certified products
~ No damage or destruction of high value ecosystems
~ No hunting of endangered animals
~ No contamination of water bodies
~ Potable water of sufficient quantity

SAN Living Wage Progression
~ All core ILO conventions:
~ Forced labor, including sexual harassment or abuse (No. 29)
~ Freedom of association (No. 87)
~ Right to organize and collective bargaining (No. 98)
~ Equal remuneration (No. 100)
~ Abolition of forced labor (No. 105)
~ Discrimination (No. 111)
~ Minimum age (No. 138)
~ Worst forms of child labor (No. 182)

Personal protective equipment for pesticide appliers
~ Imminent occupational health risk of fatality or serious injury
~ Communication procedure for attending communities’ complaints, comments and interests regarding production activities

Legitimate right to land use and tenure (including land use studies for new production areas)
~ No use of SAN banned pesticides
~ No genetically modified crops are certified

First Draft April 2013 - SAN standards 2014
Agriculture:
Plantations: 314 criteria
Smallholdings: 219 criteria
Group Administrator (GA):
Internal Management System: 28 criteria
GA compliance for smallholders: 46 criteria

Number of principles and criteria per operation type
18 principles
Agriculture (+ climate): 115 criteria
 
Group Administrator:      15 criteria

Second Draft January 2014 - SAN standards 2014
Agriculture:
Plantations: 142 criteria
Smallholdings: 61 criteria

Group Administrator (GA):
Internal Management System: 15 criteria
GA compliance for smallholders: 37 criteria


Number of principles and criteria per operation type
11 principles (including 1 livestock principle)
Agriculture:
Plantations: 142 criteria
Smallholdings: 61 criteria

Group Administrator (GA):
Internal Management System: 15 criteria
GA compliance for smallholders: 37 criteria 

 

Smallholdings
“A farm that primarily relies on family or household labor, or reciprocal workforce exchange with other members of the community. Temporary workers can be contracted during limited periods of the harvest season, but permanent labor is not contracted. The smallholding is not able to create and analyze records without external help. The smallholding applies for certification only as part of a producer group, not as an individual farm.”

Many labor requirements do not apply.
Implementation of all programs, plans and analysis that require higher technical knowledge are the responsibility of the group administrator’s internal management system.



Plantations
“Farm that regularly employs hired workers.
Plantation: A farm of 12 hectares or greater that primarily or exclusively produces agricultural crops.”

Higher complexity of production reality.
All labor requirements for hired labor do apply.
Implementation of all programs, plans and analyses.



“Climate smart” recognition
A farm can attain an additional recognition to its certification as being “Climate Smart”, if it complies with a minimum score of 80% of all the applicable climate smart criteria marked by the symbol .
For agriculture plantations, 57 criteria “climate smart” apply for a minimum of 46 criteria “climate smart” to reach the 80% that qualify for this additional recognition.
Smallholdings reach this level with 20 criteria (80% of 25 “climate smart” criteria).
Cattle ranches shall additionally apply 9 criteria for a total of 66 “climate smart” criteria or 53 “climate smart” criteria to reach the 80% level.
Small cattle farms reach this level with 23 criteria (80% of 29 “climate smart” criteria).




ISEAL Living Wage Initiative
The ISEAL Living Wage initiative - supported by FLO, FSC, Goodweave, SAI, SAN and Utz – aims at ensuring appropriate wages for workers on certified operations with hired labor (in Africa, Asia and Latin America) by integrating the Living Wage concept consistently in their auditing and certification frameworks.

The Living Wage concept is expected to be feasibly implemented by these operations for all the countries and regions we are auditing and certifying within a realistic timeframe. FLO, FSC, Goodweave, SAI, SAN and Utz are aware that additional production costs related to Living Wage can only be attended if the production income from products produced by the operations implementing the Living Wage concept reflects the related cost increase or if there is a proportional reduction in cost elsewhere.

Governments and all value chain actors need to work towards this common goal in a collaborative way.


Definition
Remuneration  received for a standard work week  by a worker in a particular place sufficient to afford a decent standard of living  for the worker and her or his family. Elements of a decent standard of living include food, housing, education, health care, water, transport, clothing, other essential needs including provision for emergencies and unexpected events. 

New High Value Ecosystem Definition
With 6 HCV values; SAN = deforestation free cert. system
A natural ecosystem of particular importance for the conservation of biodiversity, provision of ecosystem services, or maintenance of cultural values. These include areas that meet at least one of the following criteria:  
~ are occupied by endangered species or provide habitat for concentrations of endemic or migratory species;
~ are within or adjacent to a large natural ecosystem containing viable populations of most naturally occurring species in natural patterns of distribution and abundance;
~ consist of locally, sub-nationally, or nationally rare, threatened, or endangered natural ecosystems;
~ contribute critical ecosystem services (e.g. watershed protection, erosion control, flood control) to specific local or downstream populations, farms, enterprises, or ecosystems;
~ are fundamental to meeting basic needs of local communities (e.g. subsistence, health, nutrition, water);
~ are critical to local communities’ traditional cultural identity (e.g., areas of cultural, ecological, economic or religious/sacred importance);
~ Consist of natural forests.




GMOs
Certified crops shall not consist of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Measures shall be taken to avoid introducing, cultivating or processing transgenic crops. When nearby transgenic materials are accidentally introduced into a certified farm’s crop, a plan shall be documented and implemented to isolate the affected crop plants.

and so on
kindly check out

www.sanstandards.org

www.publicconsultation.sanstandards.org

---o0o---

Cegah Pembongkaran Villa di Kaki Gn. Gede, Gn. Pangrango, dan Gn. Salak Jabar

Bangkitkan Ketegaran Komunitas, agar Cegah Pembongkaran Villa di Kaki Gn. Gede, Gn. Pangrango, dan Gn. Salak Jabar




Riza V. Tjahjadi,
moderator





Menggiatkan jejaring kesadaran komunitas agar waspada tidak terperangkap teror penggusuran vila, sehingga menghilangnya mata pencaharian bagi dirinya adalah sasaran awal bagi Komunitas Peduli Penataan Lingkungan di Kaki Gn. Gede, Gn. Pangrango, dan Gn. Salak Jawa Barat.

Hal ini mengemuka dalam pertemuan konsultasi komunitas dan wakil pemilik villa di Jl. Telaga Bodas Blok A2 No. 26 Baranang Siang Indah Bogor Senin 24 Februari 2014.

Pertemuan ini adalah awal bagi upaya dialog dengan unsur-unsur Negara, khususnya dinas terkait di pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Bogor pada Maret 2014.

Main bongkar, minim sosialisasi

Berdasarkan hasil diskusi antara tim pemerhati lingkungan dengan masyarakat di kawasan kaki Gunung Gede Pangrango dan Gunung Salak Endah dan ditindaklanjuti dengan observasi lapangan, adanya keresahan masyarakat di sekitar daerah tersebut terkait dengan gencarnya tindakan pembongkaran villa yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah daerah kabupaten Bogor. Pembongkaran dilakukan karena tidak ada ijin mendirikan bangunan villa. Keresahan yang dirasakan masyarakat sekitar terhadap pelaksanaan pembongkaran ini terkait dengan hilangnya sumber penghasilan masyarakat didapat dari perawatan bangunan villa dan lingkungan serta perkebunan skala kecil yang dilakukan oleh masyararat.

Masyarakat berinisiatif untuk mengadakan kegiatan Konsultasi (urun rembuk) mencari solusi bahwa program pembongkaran villa oleh pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Bogor bukanlah solusi utama untuk mencegah terjadinya banjir dan rusaknya ekosistem lingkungan di sekitar kawasan kaki Gunung Gede Pangrango dan Gunung Salak Endah tersebut.


Setiap tahun Pemda DKI memberikan hibah sebesar Rp5 milyar untuk penanganan Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS), tata sungai dan tata ruang, yang selama ini mengakibatkan banjir yang terjadi di Jakarta
(Tempo: Rabu, 30 Oktober 2013 | 05:06 WIB: Ahok: Hibah Rp 5 Miliar ke Bogor Mungkin Kurang) 

"Setiap tahun kami (Jakarta) memberi hibah sebesar Rp 5 miliar dan itu mungkin masih kurang," kata Wakil Gubernur DKI Jakarta Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (Ahok) saat menghadiri Rapat Koordinasi Penanggulangan Bencana di Desa Gumati Resort, Kecamatan Sukaraja, Kabupaten Bogor, Selasa, 29 Oktober 20013.

Ahok meminta kepada Pemerintah Kabupaten Bogor, Kota Bogor dan Kota Depok untuk tidak memberikan dan mengeluarkan izin kepada masyarakat atau perusahaan yang akan mendirikan bangunan di sepanjang Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS). "Bukan hanya akan mengakibatkan kerusakan ekosistem, tapi juga bisa mengakibatkan penyempitan daerah aliran sungai," kata dia.

Menurut dia, berdasarkan hasil survei terakhir yang dilakukan oleh jajarannya, sebenarnya DAS di wilayah hulu atau di kawasan Puncak Kabupaten Bogor masih bagus. Kerusakan DAS, kata Ahok, sebenarnya mulai terjadi di sekitar aliran Lenteng Agung, Jakarta Selatan. "Sebenarnya yang rusak itu di daerah kita sendiri karena memang terjadi penyempitan aliran sungai karena banyak berdiri bangunan, bukan di kawasan hulu," kata dia.

Ia mengatakan pemerintah akan membebaskan dan membeli beberapa daerah di kawasan Depok dan Jakarta. "Nantinya tanah yang kita beli ini akan dijadikan sebagai waduk untuk penahan dan resapan air untuk Jakarta," kata dia. "Kita (Pemprov DKI Jakarta) itu kaya dan banyak uang, tinggal ada barangnya (tanah yang akan dijual dan dibebaskan) saja. Kalau masalah uang dan dana itu tidak ada masalah sekali."

Ahok mengatakan, sistem koordinasi antara Pemprov DKI Jakarta dengan Pemkab Bogor tersebut dilakukan di bawah koordinasi Mitra Praja Utama. Koordinasi itu pun dilakukan secara berkelanjutan dan berkesinambungan. "Ada Mitra Praja Utama sebagai wadah kerja sama antara dua pemerintah daerah," kata dia.

---o0o---